<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content Strategy: Divide and Conquer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:10:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WebsterJ</title>
		<link>http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/comment-page-1/#comment-18815</link>
		<dc:creator>WebsterJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizioninteractive.com/?p=2511#comment-18815</guid>
		<description>Great advice for smaller sites, but wouldn&#039;t you say there is a limit to this based on indexing?  If someone has a 100K page site and only 30K pages indexed it seems they may take the alternate strategy and consolidate.  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice for smaller sites, but wouldn&#8217;t you say there is a limit to this based on indexing?  If someone has a 100K page site and only 30K pages indexed it seems they may take the alternate strategy and consolidate.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/comment-page-1/#comment-18731</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizioninteractive.com/?p=2511#comment-18731</guid>
		<description>Ken, I absolutely agree. There is a sweet spot to this. You want to make focused but not go overboard. I usually find that sweet spot in keyword research, if you are drilling done too far you get low search volume and usually run into the duplication effect as you stated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, I absolutely agree. There is a sweet spot to this. You want to make focused but not go overboard. I usually find that sweet spot in keyword research, if you are drilling done too far you get low search volume and usually run into the duplication effect as you stated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Shafer</title>
		<link>http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/comment-page-1/#comment-18727</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Shafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizioninteractive.com/?p=2511#comment-18727</guid>
		<description>Great post, Josh!

I couldn&#039;t agree more. I find it is important to break up content and create pages for each meaningful &quot;concept.&quot; If you have a website that talks about the effects of different pharmaceuticals, you wouldn&#039;t want one giant FAQ-style page for each drug you were discussing. As you rightfully state, it dilutes the ability to rank for any one single &quot;concept&quot; on that page. 

However, I do believe that there are limits to the effectiveness of this segmentation. For example, if you have a real estate website, you&#039;d want to rank for concepts like the following:

&quot;House for sale&quot;
&quot;House for sale in Ohio&quot;
&quot;House for sale in Springfield, OH&quot;
&quot;Two-Bedroom House for Sale in Springfield, OH&quot;

Each &quot;concept&quot; here would potentially have it&#039;s own page. The key is to know when to quit. 

It&#039;s likely that long tail searches could include queries like &quot;Two-Bedroom House for sale in Springfield, OH with Central Air.&quot; Would you create this URL: &quot;www.example.com/OH/springfield/two-bedroom/Central-air&quot;? Where would it end? 

The idea is to create a strong-enough &quot;Two-bedroom house in Springfield, OH&quot; page so that it would rank for all the other possible amenities. See where I&#039;m going here? If you create too many pages that could all conceivable compete for the concept of &quot;two-bedroom house in &quot;Springfield, OH,&quot; you risk diluting the possibility of any of them ranking... or you lose control of the page you WANT to rank by putting out too many URLs. 

You don&#039;t want to have one page competing for multiple concepts. On the flip-side, you don&#039;t want too many pages competing for one concept.

Enjoyed the post!
-ken shafer
http://twitter.com/knit_hat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Josh!</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I find it is important to break up content and create pages for each meaningful &#8220;concept.&#8221; If you have a website that talks about the effects of different pharmaceuticals, you wouldn&#8217;t want one giant FAQ-style page for each drug you were discussing. As you rightfully state, it dilutes the ability to rank for any one single &#8220;concept&#8221; on that page. </p>
<p>However, I do believe that there are limits to the effectiveness of this segmentation. For example, if you have a real estate website, you&#8217;d want to rank for concepts like the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;House for sale&#8221;<br />
&#8220;House for sale in Ohio&#8221;<br />
&#8220;House for sale in Springfield, OH&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Two-Bedroom House for Sale in Springfield, OH&#8221;</p>
<p>Each &#8220;concept&#8221; here would potentially have it&#8217;s own page. The key is to know when to quit. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s likely that long tail searches could include queries like &#8220;Two-Bedroom House for sale in Springfield, OH with Central Air.&#8221; Would you create this URL: &#8220;www.example.com/OH/springfield/two-bedroom/Central-air&#8221;? Where would it end? </p>
<p>The idea is to create a strong-enough &#8220;Two-bedroom house in Springfield, OH&#8221; page so that it would rank for all the other possible amenities. See where I&#8217;m going here? If you create too many pages that could all conceivable compete for the concept of &#8220;two-bedroom house in &#8220;Springfield, OH,&#8221; you risk diluting the possibility of any of them ranking&#8230; or you lose control of the page you WANT to rank by putting out too many URLs. </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t want to have one page competing for multiple concepts. On the flip-side, you don&#8217;t want too many pages competing for one concept.</p>
<p>Enjoyed the post!<br />
-ken shafer<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/knit_hat" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/knit_hat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where to Get Ideas for Website Content</title>
		<link>http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/comment-page-1/#comment-18700</link>
		<dc:creator>Where to Get Ideas for Website Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizioninteractive.com/?p=2511#comment-18700</guid>
		<description>[...] colleague of mine recently wrote a great blog post about website content and how it relates to search engine optimization. It&#8217;s all about a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] colleague of mine recently wrote a great blog post about website content and how it relates to search engine optimization. It&#8217;s all about a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshuaCMcCoy (Josh McCoy)</title>
		<link>http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/comment-page-1/#comment-18688</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshuaCMcCoy (Josh McCoy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vizioninteractive.com/?p=2511#comment-18688</guid>
		<description>SEO and your Web Content Strategy: Divide and Conquer
http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO and your Web Content Strategy: Divide and Conquer<br />
<a href="http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.vizioninteractive.com/content-strategy-divide-and-conquer/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
